Skip to content
  • The Firm
  • Team
    • Associates
    • Lawyers
    • Administrative
    • Interns
  • Practice Areas
    • Business and Corporate Law
    • Tax Law
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Bankruptcy
    • Labor Law
    • Dedicated Performance (General Counsel)
  • Careers
  • Contents
    • Articles and Publications
    • In the media
    • Informatives
    • Videos and Podcasts
  • Contact
  • English
    • Portuguese (Brazil)
  • The Firm
  • Team
    • Associates
    • Lawyers
    • Administrative
    • Interns
  • Practice Areas
    • Business and Corporate Law
    • Tax Law
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Bankruptcy
    • Labor Law
    • Dedicated Performance (General Counsel)
  • Careers
  • Contents
    • Articles and Publications
    • In the media
    • Informatives
    • Videos and Podcasts
  • Contact
  • English
    • Portuguese (Brazil)
  • The Firm
  • Team
    • Associates
    • Lawyers
    • Administrative
    • Interns
  • Practice Areas
    • Business and Corporate Law
    • Tax Law
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Bankruptcy
    • Labor Law
    • Dedicated Performance (General Counsel)
  • Careers
  • Contents
    • Articles and Publications
    • In the media
    • Informatives
    • Videos and Podcasts
  • Contact
  • English
    • Portuguese (Brazil)

STJ rules that the health plan must cover the expenses of companions of elderly patients

  • Sem Autor
  • 22 de January de 2020
  • Informatives
  • English
  • Portuguese (Brazil)

Priscilla Folgosi Castanh
Lawyer at Marcos Martins Law Firm

The 3rd Panel of the STJ, in overturning a ruling by the TJ/RJ, established that it is the responsibility of the health plan to pay for the expenses of companions of elderly patients who are hospitalized, as determined by the ANS – National Supplementary Health Agency.

The case arose from the hospital’s filing of a lawsuit against the patient and the health plan, claiming payment of expenses for the companion of an elderly woman who remained hospitalized, since the health plan refused to cover these costs.

The lower court judge ordered the patient to pay the telephone costs, while the health plan was ordered to pay the costs of medicines and surgical materials With regard to the companion’s expenses, the decision determined that this would be the responsibility of the hospital itself.

The Rio de Janeiro Court of Justice upheld the dismissal of the request for payment of the companion’s expenses, on the grounds that this obligation is imposed on the hospital under the Elderly Statute.

Dissatisfied with the judgment handed down by the TJ/RJ, the hospital appealed to the STJ claiming that the obligation laid down in the Statute of the Elderly had been fully complied with, however the legal requirement does not imply that the service provided is free of charge, so that the companion’s expenses must be covered by the health insurance plan In the judgment of the special appeal, the reporting judge, Villas Bôas Cueva, stated that the responsibility for paying for the expenses of an elderly person’s companion lies with the health plan operator, in line with the resolution of the National Supplementary Health Agency – ANS Nevertheless, it reinforced the elderly person’s right to a companion, guaranteed by article 16 of the Statute of the Elderly, which is a guarantee of the right to health and the protection of the elderly guaranteed by the Federal Constitution In this way, the special appeal filed by the hospital was upheld in order to order the health insurance company to pay the costs of the elderly patient’s companion.

Your questions Talk to our lawyers


Share on social media

Related

Globo rural

Credit challenges for the Brazilian agro-industry

crédito para a agroindústria

Credit challenges for the Brazilian agro-industry

Responsabilidade dos herdeiros pelas dívidas do falecido

Heirs’ liability for the deceased’s debts: how does it work?

Agravo de instrumento não é adequado para impugnar justiça gratuita
Civil

An interlocutory appeal is not appropriate to challenge free justice

Learn more
3 de April de 2025
Mercado de fusões e aquisições
Articles

Mergers and acquisitions market needs greater legal certainty

Learn more
2 de April de 2025
Corporate

M&A market needs legal certainty

Learn more
31 de March de 2025
Quebra do sigilo bancário do alimentante: o que diz o STJ
Civil

Breach of alimony secrecy: what the STJ says

Learn more
28 de March de 2025
Page1 Page2 Page3 Page4 Page5
  • Menu
  • The Firm
  • Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Menu
  • The Firm
  • Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Contents
  • Articles and Publications
  • Informatives
  • Videos and Podcasts
  • In the media
  • Contents
  • Articles and Publications
  • Informatives
  • Videos and Podcasts
  • In the media

São Paulo

Av. Magalhães de Castro, 4.800, Park Tower - 17º andar
Jardim Panorama, São Paulo/SP
+55 (11) 4084-8900
Ver mapa

Marília

Rua Presidente Vargas, 347
Boa Vista - Marília/SP
+55 (14) 3413-2223
Ver mapa

[email protected]

Marcos Martins Advogados 2025 @ All rights reserved